A Broadband and ADSL forum. BroadbanterBanter

Welcome to BroadbanterBanter.

You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.

Go Back   Home » BroadbanterBanter forum » Newsgroup Discussions » uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) (uk.telecom.broadband) Discussion of broadband services, technology and equipment as provided in the UK. Discussions of specific services based on ADSL, cable modems or other broadband technology are also on-topic. Advertising is not allowed.

Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th 18, 10:52 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,uk.finance,uk.misc,uk.politics.misc
7[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 464
Default Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter

Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter
------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...broadband.html

The fees to fill in forms for permissions to install fiber
is now the price of 500 sheets of paper per meter in Buttfsckinghamshire.
Per kilometer, the price is 500,000 sheets of paper.

Oh Buttfsckinghamshire residents, you are NOT going to any Internet any time soon.

They are fscking fscked by their council unless they elect
less corrupt ones.

Especially after introduction of additional bond fees that is
held back for 2 FSCKING years!!!!!!!!!!!!! All of a sudden.
Exceptionally notable as being NOT NECESSARY for fiber installation
in most places. Unless you are a corruption driven council
of Buttfsckinghamshire.

Yea, while we are it, why not tax oxygen as well. In case we run out of oxygen
during fiber installation due to a an inexplicable alteration
of the space time continuum while the *fscking* fibre is being laid.

On top you must pay the *fscking* DARK FIBER TAX to OFFCUM as well.

This means another *fscking* 25,000 to 85,000 for a 10gbit symmetric fiber line.

While in Singapore, residents can get it for $200 a month.
And BT pays about the same 150 a month for all its 1 million
gigabit fiber links after being exempted from DARK FIBER TAX.

So offcum, what about excepting everyone from DARK FIBER TAX?
Like window tax abolition, its a good thing for everyone to
have fiber and not pay DARK FIBER TAX.



  #2  
Old May 8th 18, 12:05 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
R. Mark Clayton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 446
Default Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 10:52:59 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter
------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...broadband.html

The fees to fill in forms for permissions to install fiber
is now the price of 500 sheets of paper per meter in Buttfsckinghamshire.
Per kilometer, the price is 500,000 sheets of paper.

Oh Buttfsckinghamshire residents, you are NOT going to any Internet any time soon.

They are fscking fscked by their council unless they elect
less corrupt ones.

Especially after introduction of additional bond fees that is
held back for 2 FSCKING years!!!!!!!!!!!!! All of a sudden.
Exceptionally notable as being NOT NECESSARY for fiber installation
in most places. Unless you are a corruption driven council
of Buttfsckinghamshire.

Yea, while we are it, why not tax oxygen as well. In case we run out of oxygen
during fiber installation due to a an inexplicable alteration
of the space time continuum while the *fscking* fibre is being laid.

On top you must pay the *fscking* DARK FIBER TAX to OFFCUM as well.

This means another *fscking* 25,000 to 85,000 for a 10gbit symmetric fiber line.

While in Singapore, residents can get it for $200 a month.
And BT pays about the same 150 a month for all its 1 million
gigabit fiber links after being exempted from DARK FIBER TAX.

So offcum, what about excepting everyone from DARK FIBER TAX?
Like window tax abolition, its a good thing for everyone to
have fiber and not pay DARK FIBER TAX.


When Nynex installed cable here around twenty years ago, they severed tree roots, cut other utilities, dreadful backfill and finish (most needed or still needs redoing) and lots of rework because of faults.

Sounds like you want to do the same sort of cowboy job and not take responsibility for any damage to the roads and pavements.
  #3  
Old May 8th 18, 08:47 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
7[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 464
Default Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter

R. Mark Clayton wrote:

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 10:52:59 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter
------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...broadband.html

The fees to fill in forms for permissions to install fiber
is now the price of 500 sheets of paper per meter in Buttfsckinghamshire.
Per kilometer, the price is 500,000 sheets of paper.

Oh Buttfsckinghamshire residents, you are NOT going to any Internet any
time soon.

They are fscking fscked by their council unless they elect
less corrupt ones.

Especially after introduction of additional bond fees that is
held back for 2 FSCKING years!!!!!!!!!!!!! All of a sudden.
Exceptionally notable as being NOT NECESSARY for fiber installation
in most places. Unless you are a corruption driven council
of Buttfsckinghamshire.

Yea, while we are it, why not tax oxygen as well. In case we run out of
oxygen during fiber installation due to a an inexplicable alteration
of the space time continuum while the *fscking* fibre is being laid.

On top you must pay the *fscking* DARK FIBER TAX to OFFCUM as well.

This means another *fscking* 25,000 to 85,000 for a 10gbit symmetric
fiber line.

While in Singapore, residents can get it for $200 a month.
And BT pays about the same 150 a month for all its 1 million
gigabit fiber links after being exempted from DARK FIBER TAX.

So offcum, what about excepting everyone from DARK FIBER TAX?
Like window tax abolition, its a good thing for everyone to
have fiber and not pay DARK FIBER TAX.


When Nynex installed cable here around twenty years ago, they severed tree
roots, cut other utilities, dreadful backfill and finish (most needed or
still needs redoing) and lots of rework because of faults.

Sounds like you want to do the same sort of cowboy job and not take
responsibility for any damage to the roads and pavements.


Sounds like your council has no idea how to manage inspections.
Is it run by buttfsckinstani cousins? If so, it sounds like you ain't got
fast internet because they are the same butfsckistanies
operating buttfsckinghamshire council which means you don't deserve
fast internet anyway for electing sister shaggers to councils instead
of talent.


  #4  
Old May 8th 18, 09:14 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
R. Mark Clayton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 446
Default Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 20:47:31 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
R. Mark Clayton wrote:

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 10:52:59 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter
------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...broadband.html

The fees to fill in forms for permissions to install fiber
is now the price of 500 sheets of paper per meter in Buttfsckinghamshire.
Per kilometer, the price is 500,000 sheets of paper.

Oh Buttfsckinghamshire residents, you are NOT going to any Internet any
time soon.

They are fscking fscked by their council unless they elect
less corrupt ones.

Especially after introduction of additional bond fees that is
held back for 2 FSCKING years!!!!!!!!!!!!! All of a sudden.
Exceptionally notable as being NOT NECESSARY for fiber installation
in most places. Unless you are a corruption driven council
of Buttfsckinghamshire.

Yea, while we are it, why not tax oxygen as well. In case we run out of
oxygen during fiber installation due to a an inexplicable alteration
of the space time continuum while the *fscking* fibre is being laid.

On top you must pay the *fscking* DARK FIBER TAX to OFFCUM as well.

This means another *fscking* 25,000 to 85,000 for a 10gbit symmetric
fiber line.

While in Singapore, residents can get it for $200 a month.
And BT pays about the same 150 a month for all its 1 million
gigabit fiber links after being exempted from DARK FIBER TAX.

So offcum, what about excepting everyone from DARK FIBER TAX?
Like window tax abolition, its a good thing for everyone to
have fiber and not pay DARK FIBER TAX.


When Nynex installed cable here around twenty years ago, they severed tree
roots, cut other utilities, dreadful backfill and finish (most needed or
still needs redoing) and lots of rework because of faults.

Sounds like you want to do the same sort of cowboy job and not take
responsibility for any damage to the roads and pavements.


Sounds like your council has no idea how to manage inspections.
Is it run by buttfsckinstani cousins? If so, it sounds like you ain't got
fast internet because they are the same butfsckistanies
operating buttfsckinghamshire council which means you don't deserve
fast internet anyway for electing sister shaggers to councils instead
of talent.


Sounds like Buck's does - demanding proper documentation for a start, probably something Hyperoptic never normally bothers with...
  #5  
Old May 9th 18, 10:26 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
7[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 464
Default Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter

R. Mark Clayton wrote:

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 20:47:31 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
R. Mark Clayton wrote:

On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 10:52:59 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
Buttfsckinghamshire fiber fees 500 sheets of paper per meter
------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...broadband.html

The fees to fill in forms for permissions to install fiber
is now the price of 500 sheets of paper per meter in
Buttfsckinghamshire. Per kilometer, the price is 500,000 sheets of
paper.

Oh Buttfsckinghamshire residents, you are NOT going to any Internet
any time soon.

They are fscking fscked by their council unless they elect
less corrupt ones.

Especially after introduction of additional bond fees that is
held back for 2 FSCKING years!!!!!!!!!!!!! All of a sudden.
Exceptionally notable as being NOT NECESSARY for fiber installation
in most places. Unless you are a corruption driven council
of Buttfsckinghamshire.

Yea, while we are it, why not tax oxygen as well. In case we run out
of oxygen during fiber installation due to a an inexplicable
alteration of the space time continuum while the *fscking* fibre is
being laid.

On top you must pay the *fscking* DARK FIBER TAX to OFFCUM as well.

This means another *fscking* 25,000 to 85,000 for a 10gbit symmetric
fiber line.

While in Singapore, residents can get it for $200 a month.
And BT pays about the same 150 a month for all its 1 million
gigabit fiber links after being exempted from DARK FIBER TAX.

So offcum, what about excepting everyone from DARK FIBER TAX?
Like window tax abolition, its a good thing for everyone to
have fiber and not pay DARK FIBER TAX.

When Nynex installed cable here around twenty years ago, they severed
tree roots, cut other utilities, dreadful backfill and finish (most
needed or still needs redoing) and lots of rework because of faults.

Sounds like you want to do the same sort of cowboy job and not take
responsibility for any damage to the roads and pavements.


Sounds like your council has no idea how to manage inspections.
Is it run by buttfsckinstani cousins? If so, it sounds like you ain't got
fast internet because they are the same butfsckistanies
operating buttfsckinghamshire council which means you don't deserve
fast internet anyway for electing sister shaggers to councils instead
of talent.


Sounds like Buck's does - demanding proper documentation for a start,
probably something Hyperoptic never normally bothers with...


Sounds like you live in a Buttfsckistanishire council of sister shaggers
where no document is proper until some brown envelopes
stuffed full of bitcoins have parted hands.

And what happens to all this documentation?
If we levy 1 charge to each councillor's wages for each paper
which they can reclaim back if they read it all (which we ensure
by asking them to type out 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th etc [prime numbers]
word in CAPs, and sign it, per page, and email it) would these
sister shagging council entities demand paper I wonder.
No point in asking for proper documentation until you pay the 1 per
page charge and claim it back me thinks.



 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Offconn agrees to Bhtee's 5000 per install + 5000 per year 100mbit line fees Stephen uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 2 June 21st 15 12:41 PM
Draft paper submission deadline is extended: CCN-10, Orlando, USA James Heralds uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP) 0 February 6th 10 03:36 PM
White Paper: Automated Sound Quality Estimation [email protected] uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 0 February 22nd 09 02:44 PM
Paper on routers ?uzzled uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 5 February 23rd 05 11:44 AM
Net Meter v DU Meter Linedancer uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 15 October 15th 04 06:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2018 BroadbanterBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.