A Broadband and ADSL forum. BroadbanterBanter

Welcome to BroadbanterBanter.

You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.

Go Back   Home » BroadbanterBanter forum » Newsgroup Discussions » uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) (uk.telecom.broadband) Discussion of broadband services, technology and equipment as provided in the UK. Discussions of specific services based on ADSL, cable modems or other broadband technology are also on-topic. Advertising is not allowed.

the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th 19, 06:33 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Abandoned Trolley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?


hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?

AT

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

  #2  
Old January 16th 19, 11:57 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
MissRiaElaine[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 204
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?


Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


--
Ria in Aberdeen

[Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct]
  #3  
Old January 17th 19, 12:00 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Bob Eager[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:57:41 +0000, MissRiaElaine wrote:

On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no
wired connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?


Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


Has never bothered me. The router I use isn't even wireless. I use one
wired connection into the main gigabit switches (with a firewall box in
between, as it happens). I do have wireless APs hung off the gigfabit
network. So the only thing that's on the 100Mb/s connection is the VDSL
link - which is much slower than that.
  #4  
Old January 17th 19, 09:14 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Chris Green
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?


Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.

All three FTTC routers I've tried (a D-Link, a TP-Link and a Draytek)
recently have had four Gigabit ports, though my old Draytek 2820n has
only one Gigabit port and three 100Mb/s. I think *modern* routers do
now tend to have all Gigabit.

--
Chris Green

  #5  
Old January 17th 19, 09:15 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
NY
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 492
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

"MissRiaElaine" wrote in message
...
On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number of
wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are offering
wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?


Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless. I'm
waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


They're already making laptops without them: you have to buy an add-on
USB-Ethernet port if you want one, just as you have to buy an add-on
CD/DVD/BluRay drive if you want one.

  #6  
Old January 17th 19, 09:34 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Java Jive
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 475
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On 17/01/2019 09:14, Chris Green wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.


Given that Gigabit cabling and switches and PCs with Gigabit ports have
all been widely and cheaply available for over a decade, I think it's
reprehensible. But you can only vote with your wallet - just don't
buy kit with only Fast Ethernet capability.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all


Agreed. The moment you start backing up PC OS image files or media
files over your LAN, Gigabit comes into its own. As it happens I've had
to revert temporarily to having my servers connected to the rest of the
LAN via WiFi, and even though it's 802.11n accessing them is treacle slow.

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?


Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.


Yes.

I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


Why? Even though you may only normally use WiFi, sometimes unforeseen
circumstances can make a faster cabled connection incredibly useful.

All three FTTC routers I've tried (a D-Link, a TP-Link and a Draytek)
recently have had four Gigabit ports, though my old Draytek 2820n has
only one Gigabit port and three 100Mb/s. I think *modern* routers do
now tend to have all Gigabit.


Yes, same here - Cisco WAG320n and DrayTek 2830n.
  #7  
Old January 17th 19, 11:06 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Tony Mountifield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

In article ,
Java Jive wrote:
On 17/01/2019 09:14, Chris Green wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote:
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


Why? Even though you may only normally use WiFi, sometimes unforeseen
circumstances can make a faster cabled connection incredibly useful.


I didn't read that as "I'm hoping for a router with no Ethernet ports",
but rather as "I anticipate it's only a matter of time before routers
with no Ethernet ports come on the market."

Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: - http://tony.mountifield.org
  #8  
Old January 17th 19, 11:53 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
R. Mark Clayton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:34:02 UTC, Abandoned Trolley wrote:
hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?

AT

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com


Not my experience - BT routers since Hub5 in 2013 have Gigabit ports and manages well more than 100Mbps on wireless.
  #9  
Old January 17th 19, 01:10 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
MissRiaElaine[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 204
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On 17/01/2019 00:00, Bob Eager wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:57:41 +0000, MissRiaElaine wrote:


Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.


Has never bothered me. The router I use isn't even wireless. I use one
wired connection into the main gigabit switches (with a firewall box in
between, as it happens). I do have wireless APs hung off the gigfabit
network. So the only thing that's on the 100Mb/s connection is the VDSL
link - which is much slower than that.


I have the Sky Q router for my sins, it's not the best by any stretch of
the imagination, but it works. Only real drawbacks are no easy wall
mounting fixings and only 2 Ethernet ports, but at least both are
Gigabit. Only use one of them to link to the main switch in the rack
anyway, and all I use wireless for is the occasional checking of email
on the phone if there aren't any PC's switched on.


--
Ria in Aberdeen

[Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct]
  #10  
Old January 17th 19, 01:12 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
MissRiaElaine[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 204
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On 17/01/2019 09:15, NY wrote:

They're already making laptops without them: you have to buy an add-on
USB-Ethernet port if you want one, just as you have to buy an add-on
CD/DVD/BluRay drive if you want one.


It's sad to hear that, but I'm not surprised.


--
Ria in Aberdeen

[Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct]
 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gigabit V Fast Ethernet Steven Campbell uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 2 July 18th 05 10:09 PM
Basic gigabit ethernet question Drew M uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 3 January 26th 05 01:27 AM
Gigabit ethernet - wiring etc. [email protected] uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 12 October 12th 04 05:32 PM
Is a single-port ADSL router the same as a single-port ethernet modem? Graeme Allen uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 6 January 26th 04 11:55 PM
Gigabit ethernet cards Rob Hemmings uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 2 November 13th 03 12:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2019 BroadbanterBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.